[VIEWED 6174
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
nepaliraja
Please log in to subscribe to nepaliraja's postings.
Posted on 10-16-09 7:51
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
|
yellow
Please log in to subscribe to yellow's postings.
Posted on 10-16-09 10:47
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
abc + aB + aBc ac(b+B) + aB ac x 0 + aB aB B = your Bold B Not sure if this is correct.
Last edited: 16-Oct-09 10:49 AM
|
|
|
timer
Please log in to subscribe to timer's postings.
Posted on 10-16-09 11:12
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I have made little bit clear The confusion here is, it seems it is giving to different answers A.B.C +A.Bnot Another is A.C+A.Bnot I am little bit confused here. Does it has two solution?
|
|
|
dynamite
Please log in to subscribe to dynamite's postings.
Posted on 10-16-09 11:15
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Strictly following the precedence i.e (. before +) A.B.C + A. B (not A . not C) (De morgans law) A.B.C + A.B.notA.notC A.B.C + (A.notA).B.notC A and not A = False ABC + False so if any of the A or B or C is false the result is False and for the expression to be true they all have to be True I am assuming that the bnot.(A+C) = b.not(A+C) Please consult the solution below, the above is solved on wrong assumption :D
Last edited: 16-Oct-09 11:22 AM
Last edited: 16-Oct-09 11:40 AM
|
|
|
dynamite
Please log in to subscribe to dynamite's postings.
Posted on 10-16-09 11:31
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
assuming bnot = not b a.b.c + a.notb.a + a.notb.c (distributive) a.b.c + a.notb + a.notbc ( a.a = a) a.c.b + a.c.notb +a.notb (re-arranging) ac(b+ notb) + a.notb ( distributive) b+ notb = true therefore ac + a.notb
Last edited: 16-Oct-09 11:36 AM
|
|