We can barely find living symbol of love in today's sophisticated world. But once in the while in fursad I siit and think of LOVERS who make a history. If you guys were to rate the symbol of love who you would vote. After lots of brainstroming choice is RADHA KRISHNA.

Our unfortunate western world don't know shit about R-K, rather they justify for the couple of Shake's fantasy.

In Sanskrit, the word is maithuna, which basically means unification.
Then you have something else they call HASTHA-MAITHUNA. It's an ancient art that people practice(particularly men) even to this day!

I am not sure if Lord Krishna of RAMAYAN had AIDS .

But I am sure modern day gangbang was originated from MAHABHARATA .

You guys should watch video of Panch Pandavas jointly involved in sexual intercourse with lonely Dropadi .

^True...Arjun would thrust his manliness in her cunt..while Yudhistera would bust a load in her mouth...Bhima would give her the business from behind....and Nakul and Sadave, resourceful as ever, would each grab her breast and proceed to titty-hump her....

K bhayo.....sajha ma aaj kaal.....started with simple question of Who is the greatest "premi premika" and ended up in "raas lila" of Draupadi with his five husbands with a picture perfect explanation of who went what way to get the satisfaction.....

Sajha is great.....

RAM PRASAD

aah u mean the color range in the monitor//eeh! no sound either...hmm as kalanki suggested definetly try for drivers....ok now i understnad ur question,,but u sud have given more info..like what kind of windows r u using and other craps??

haha ok ur welcomed..in advanced

ooh shit wrong post! am very sorry guys..


hahaha this post is getting halarious..dude, moneyminded ur concept is definetly khatra..have u ever thought of publishing a book??

Sitara, hahahah how can i man perform YIn Yang..or whatever, its just not possible, we loose our juice too soon,,hahah and ur welcomed in advance, dont have to thank me for giving out the information...

later guys...

This thread is getting awfully funny (pun intended).

Why does sex always have to be ridiculed? Why does it have to be seen as blasphemous? Heck, even the Gods do it! And especially the Gods do it! If humans were made as an image of God, then the fact that humans have sex logically means "so do the Gods!"

Krishna was the divine lover -- yeah, sure we can sugarcoat it and say his love for Radha and the Gopis was a "higher form" of "divine" love. Then we're implying that having sex (or "making love") is a "lower" form of love. Are we doing that? I can anticipate a rebuttal to this effect "Well, it depends on WHO one is having sex (or making love) to" and I can buy that argument because I can see the merit in "differentiation" which is valid. But imposing a hierarchy doesn't sit well with the notion of what love is. And Love, in the end, is just love -- why should there be a hierarchy? Sure, there is a difference in the way love is felt. But must the difference be viewed in a spatial metaphor where one "form" of love is higher or lower? As Gertrude Stein said, "A rose is a rose is a rose is a rose!" And love is as natural and as beautiful as a rose!

In peace.

I don't know about you guys but I don't even know what love is these days. To me it's just a craziness and obsession to one another. Or may be I'm going insane.

Peace Out

I started this thread with simple question, but I don't know from where people brought this Aids, hemophilla, gangbang and what not. Most of the statement I read here is based on illogical fallacy. MM! you are great at putting your words in various way. Somewhere in Sajha I read your sayign about hindu Mythology, was good though, but in this thread you put things otherway around and trying to be hardcore critics. Infact you didn't know you are somehow criticizing your pre-thought.

Simple Gal you are right, there is nothing wrong about sex whether god do it or human. Anyway In different mythological script its been presented as form of art and love. So we should limit our thinking to that extend only. We can come out with any kind of conclusion if we use left instead of right side of our brain. Most of us worship SHIVA LINGA as a part of GOD. That Sclupture not just symbolize LINGA, that linga is inside YONI of Sati as well. So what does that mean? No wonder, some of us will start writing about pre-historic porn action of SHIVA and SHAKTI. Wisely looking at it, it symbolized origin, i.e origin of mankind. And if you unfold the Myth you will see SHIVA and SHAKIT was the origin. It is that simple and its just matter of how we analyse.

Before making fun of Hindu and Hinduism, simple question is how many of us know about GEETA? ya I have heard about it but hvn't got chance to go through it completely. How many of us have even touch VEDAs, atleast I haven't. For your guys information, there are lots of research going on over VEDAs and yes its in Germany, top notch university are doing research over it. We always appreciate westerner theory and hypothesis, but never tried to think those knowlegde and idea are already in VEDAS, PURAN and Bhagwat GEETA, rather we end up makin fun of it. If I ask you guys simple question "WHO BROUGHT AN IDEA OF FLYING MACHINE?", we will say L N DaVinci, thats what we have taught in Mahendra Mala (i dont know the grade). Come on, stress little bit- Rawan had had that before the idea click to LN Davinci. There are lots of things like this from Agniasthra to Brahmasthra which resembles today's WMD and so on, so forth.

I would have little elaborate over R & K unfortunately I didn't. Since I have started this thread I would like to put little light over it. If you guys accept that RAAS LILA is Hardcore sex you should accept the fact Krishna was just about ten years of age at that time, when he did Raas Lila, so was Radha. I believe society then was culturally riched than ours. So if somebody senior would had known Krishna doing sex, Krishna's story would have end right there. So at the age of 10 all his love for Gopis in general and Radha in particular should be seen as divine love between atman and paramatman, without any physical or carnal element. there was spiritual content of love between man and woman.

When krishna flee to MATHURA, he didn't come back Gokul and radha was back there in Gokul. One of Krishna's best friend was MAHAGYANI, his name was UDHAV. They were having debate over MEANS OF ACHIEVING SALVATION. Krishna tried to convince UDHAV that there is no other than love (which is bhakti) to the GOD to achieve SALVATION. Krishna had to send UDHAV to Gokul asking to deliver his message but his intention was to let UDHAV observe extreme love of Radha and Gopis. When he got there he saw extreme devotion and love of GOPIS towards Krishna. It was charismatic. There after UDHAV himself started BHAKTI MARG. And love was still there between Radha and Krishna when they are not physically together.

I am not that hardcore gyani or bhakti, but whatever come to my knowledge I do not think illogically. And I am not sure does everything happened for real or not, but whatever the story and tell was, it was hilarious. The story about A DIVINE LOVE. If you guys think I am frustrated over this thread, yes I am, thats why I am writing this long. By the way, whoever wants to read humor and think nonsense about Hindu Script, religion read DEVASHUR sangram by MODNATH PRASHIT you will love it. There he has define the GOD in his own way.


God bless Nepal.

I started this thread with simple question, but I don't know from where people brought this Aids, hemophilla, gangbang and what not. Most of the statement I read here is based on illogical fallacy. MM! you are great at putting your words in various way. Somewhere in Sajha I read your sayign about hindu Mythology, was good though, but in this thread you put things otherway around and trying to be hardcore critics. Infact you didn't know you are somehow criticizing your pre-thought.

Simple Gal you are right, there is nothing wrong about sex whether god do it or human. Anyway In different mythological script its been presented as form of art and love. So we should limit our thinking to that extend only. We can come out with any kind of conclusion if we use left instead of right side of our brain. Most of us worship SHIVA LINGA as a part of GOD. That Sclupture not just symbolize LINGA, that linga is inside YONI of Sati as well. So what does that mean? No wonder, some of us will start writing about pre-historic porn action of SHIVA and SHAKTI. Wisely looking at it, it symbolized origin, i.e origin of mankind. And if you unfold the Myth you will see SHIVA and SHAKIT was the origin. It is that simple and its just matter of how we analyse.

Before making fun of Hindu and Hinduism, simple question is how many of us know about GEETA? ya I have heard about it but hvn't got chance to go through it completely. How many of us have even touch VEDAs, atleast I haven't. For your guys information, there are lots of research going on over VEDAs and yes its in Germany, top notch university are doing research over it. We always appreciate westerner theory and hypothesis, but never tried to think those knowlegde and idea are already in VEDAS, PURAN and Bhagwat GEETA, rather we end up makin fun of it. If I ask you guys simple question "WHO BROUGHT AN IDEA OF FLYING MACHINE?", we will say L N DaVinci, thats what we have taught in Mahendra Mala (i dont know the grade). Come on, stress little bit- Rawan had had that before the idea click to LN Davinci. There are lots of things like this from Agniasthra to Brahmasthra which resembles today's WMD and so on, so forth.

I would have little elaborate over R & K unfortunately I didn't. Since I have started this thread I would like to put little light over it. If you guys accept that RAAS LILA is Hardcore sex you should accept the fact Krishna was just about ten years of age at that time, when he did Raas Lila, so was Radha. I believe society then was culturally riched than ours. So if somebody senior would had known Krishna doing sex, Krishna's story would have end right there. So at the age of 10 all his love for Gopis in general and Radha in particular should be seen as divine love between atman and paramatman, without any physical or carnal element. there was spiritual content of love between man and woman.

When krishna flee to MATHURA, he didn't come back Gokul and radha was back there in Gokul. One of Krishna's best friend was MAHAGYANI, his name was UDHAV. They were having debate over MEANS OF ACHIEVING SALVATION. Krishna tried to convince UDHAV that there is no other than love (which is bhakti) to the GOD to achieve SALVATION. Krishna had to send UDHAV to Gokul asking to deliver his message but his intention was to let UDHAV observe extreme love of Radha and Gopis. When he got there he saw extreme devotion and love of GOPIS towards Krishna. It was charismatic. There after UDHAV himself started BHAKTI MARG. And love was still there between Radha and Krishna when they are not physically together.

I am not that hardcore gyani or bhakti, but whatever come to my knowledge I do not think illogically. And I am not sure does everything happened for real or not, but whatever the story and tell was, it was hilarious. The story about A DIVINE LOVE. If you guys think I am frustrated over this thread, yes I am, thats why I am writing this long. By the way, whoever wants to read humor and think nonsense about Hindu Script, religion read DEVASHUR sangram by MODNATH PRASHIT you will love it. There he has define the GOD in his own way.


God bless Nepal.

Pisces,

1. Firsts don't take threads in Sajha so seriously and stop acting like it is your baby. U are behaving like some body is littering in your porch.

2. Second, you said, "kiddo needless to talk to you coz i believe you don't understand at all" Matter of fact, You didn't understand. Ask Confuse and Sitara, who would tell u that I was just trying to be funny by imitating MoneyMinded. U should read what he writes and see what I meant.

3. Bhakti Bhaav u r referring to sounds like Orgasm, honestly. No offense. Again, ask MoneyMinded, Sajha Hero.

4. To irritate u more, here is a joke I made up myself. No imitation this time:
What did Pandav's asked the vendor when Draupadi asked them to bring a condom?

"Do you have a rubber Glove?"

There!!!

Pisces -- Welcome to the world of sajha, where every topic raised goes through a roller-coaster ride! Sometimes it's up, sometimes down, and maybe, if you're lucky, it goes straight, but only momentarily before you're again up or down! And that's the beauty of this site. : ) Learning and discourse are not linear because human thought is not linear. And when so many different human beings are "interacting" as in this site, then boy do we have the perfect example of divergent thinking! And THAT is the beginning of true learning.

So, hold on to your seat and enjoy the ride!

Calm down guys. I mean no offence for reader and writer. As you said Thread Sajha is not be taken seriously, I just put my views and logic my own way. Simply I didn't applaude at your saying doesn't mean I am acting like baby. And yes Simple_Gal, I am riding roller coaster hehehehehe..its hella scary. I return your objection back to you. Remember its like riding roller coaster hehehehe.

Anyway this is debate I took as debate. If I would have gone hand in hand with you guys, there is no point for me to raise the topic. Thats why SAJHA is MAJJA. I do understand Kiddo and Simple_Gal, I guess u guys better understand that too.. No offence.

God bless Nepal.

hahahaha..Oh my god! hahaha now i am seriously falling off my seat..haha this is funny..
hey simple gal..hahaha ..good try!..its funny how moneyminded said it, its not funny to hear Krishna and Radha were having sex, thats nasty...

yah yah, whoever is kiddo refering to, kiddo was just immitating moneyminded..and that was halrious, if you are a follower of moneymined like me u wud understand...

and kiddo, bro one more thing man, AIDS was started coz a african man screwed a monkey...hahah, i just felt like saying it..again..

hahaha dude this is funny tho

Well ppl just to let ya know one thing.. Radha and Krishna were having SEX. I was in a painting class and we had to do lots and lots of paintings of radha and krishna.. and many of their paintings showed them either nude or partially naked.. what do you say to that. And that doesnt mean that they were not in love. Sex is called "making love" because love is INVOLVED.. REMEMBER?? anyways abt the hindu culture.. I respect it a lot and wouldnt like to see anyone make fun of it. But what happened between Radha and Krishna was natural.. believe it or not.. and non the less he is GOD and he was a damn clever man.. So stop analyzin what happened thousands pf years back and chill. Our discussion here cant change anythin!! So chill and worship them as we always have

anj, making love is not having sex..sex is a feeling of pleasure, u dont have to be in love to have sex.heck! i wud even lie to have sex with a hot chick...so thats a misconception man, ..

ooh yah, one more thing...i wud never lie to a person i am in love wiht..so that makes it confusing,,how do u know i am actually in love with u..hahaha...i sound like a evil guy now...:) i am not a evil guy ppl :)

U r funny out ther confused dude.....................The only thing i want to say is ..........................the greatest lover of all time is Shiva and parwati...........u know why look at the shiva living in cave..............smoking weed.......surronded by animals ...........................he dont have gotra or class still he is natural charmer............................he got parvati and parvati didnot mind being his second wife.................actually she helped him to come out of satywati taruma where shiva was passing throug.............He showed us u call fall in love again..............and again and again until u find the rite one..............by the information about shiva inga in side parvati overy....................well why? we praise it coz it is source how we come?

does it make sense..................if there is no linga no yoni .............there is no sajha and no sajhatis...................everything............


for u picese dude.........................i do like hindusim coz of complication but our relegion is also most manupulated by brahamas for their personal benifts..........................like untouchable cant read vedas where do they say that..............it is never mention in any veda..........coz if they read then the brahmans who should be following brahmas philoshopy will be geopardy............................." bahun haru magi khane bhada will be gone, they have been poision kings and leader in name of relegion" so i cant support everything what relegion says............coz most of them are bullshit.............i am trying to modify ppls view.............if there was no krishna......first of all there was no mahabharat................" he was champaing to manupulate ppl like american president.................u give weapon from one hand to one team and in mean time u go for peace talk with other team" that is what krishna is.........he is a thug.........

ke bhagwan le gati kt sanga pani sutnu hune.........tyo chai raslia...........hami le garyo bhane charitra hin.................ani indra le vishwamitra ko tapasya bhanga garna apsara ( urvasi) pathuna hune.................do u think i support this kind of stupid stuff in hindiusm............no way.........dude analysis it before u follow.

Krishna dying of a toe injury is related to the death of Achille from Greek mythology. That's why the tip of the toe is called "Kishun Toe."

one old wrinly sausage and a big flat pancake
thats the symbol of love my frens...